Sunday, 22 May 2022

太上感應篇 Taishang Ganying Pian: Three translations

 太上感應篇
太上老君感應篇
Taishang Ganying Pian 
Watters : The KAN YING PIEN OR A Chapter On the Causes which Induce Retribution by the Grand Supreme 
Legge: THE THÂI-SHANG TRACTATE OF ACTIONS AND THEIR RETRIBUTIONS
Carus: TREATISE OF THE EXALTED ONE ON RESPONSE AND RETRIBUTION

Over the past months, we have featured translations of several famous popular Chinese morality books on. The first such book was 關聖帝君覺世真經-- The Sage Therach Guan's true Scripture to Awaken the world: the second was 文昌帝君陰騭文 -- . Wenchang's Treatise on Secret Merit  Now we finally the last of this trilogy, the Taishang Ganying pian-- The treatise of the Highest One on Ganying. 

In the Carus and Suzuki translation of the text. it is stated that this was one of the most widely distributed books of all China. Whilst this is no longer true, the Taishang Ganying Pian is still republished now and then by Chinese religious presses; in fact it is one of the very few regularly distributed religious books that is not a buddhist sutra of some form. Still, it nonetheless is published by Buddhist presses, because the morality espoused in the book should be generally promoted. 

The Taishang Ganying Pian- as are the Sage Thearch Guan and Wenchang Texts- is about Ganying. Generally the term refers to a kind of associateve resonance; a kind of relationship between two objects that are related to each other, and can  interact from a distance. In the context of this text, the interactions are between good or bad deeds, and quality of life. If one does good things, good things would come to you; the converse if one does bad things. In a way it resembles popular notions of karma. However, some aspects of the doctrine may strike modern as strange. For one, the mechanism by which this is done, is by omnipresent spirits. These spirits report acts to the gods, who would correspondingly send good or bad luck to a person. For another, it is taken as a matter of course that retribution can devolve on people other than the sinner. The text explicitly states that Wives and children can die as a consequence of the man's sins; in turn, numerous other miracle tales attest to people's children suffering good (or bad) fortune owing to the deeds of their ancestors. 

Whilst Wenchang's treatise on secret merit is positive-- a series of injunctions on what to do, Taishang Laojun's treatise is negative-- For the most part it is a long list of sins. There are some 137 in total. 

The list of sins may strike the modern reader as strange. It struck some of the translators as strange as well. Extremely egregious sins (murder, rebellion) are condemned in the same terms as one that are relatively minor (killing snakes, pointing at stars). The reason why this is so may be seen from the wider context of Ganying. The consequence of evil deeds is worldy misfortune. If only significant evils were prohibited, every instance of misfortune occurring to a person would be seen as evidence of secret murder, adultery etc. However, by mixing in relatively minor transgressions like pointing at the luminaries, the unfortunate is given the benefit of the doubt. Indeed,  this very treatise condemns the practise: "見他失便,便說他過; on seeing others have misadventures,  Speaks of them as committing faults".

Sunday, 27 March 2022

Preliminary remarks on Liao-fan's four lessons

 One of the more curious Chinese morality books is Liao-fan's four lessons: it shows the relationship between actions and the results of natal astrology. However, despite its importance- and its continual citation by numerous fortunetellers, it has received zero attention in English.

 The reason would be apparent on analysis of its contents: The worldview of this book has been more-or-less completely extirpated from modern society. For starters, as much as this text is a morality book, it is one that is ultimately rooted in mantic techniques-- specifically the reason why natal astrology even works, and how a person can transcend it. In many ways, the book is a rationalised, expanded version of the more direct cause-effect/ 'karma' mentioned in texts like the Taishang Ganying Pian, and Wenchang's treatiese on secret merit. However, unlike the above texts, which are really nothing more than long lists of things you should and should not do, this book provides something more: actual principles by which you can carry out the ways in which the precepts can be made. 

 A summary of the book can be made as such: 

The first part of the book  spiritual autobiography of Yuan Liaofan.  In his youth, he encountered a fortuneteller, who calculated his future life events to pinpoint accuracy for 20 years. The prediction is mixed: as much as he would rise to success in life, he would never pass the imperial examination, nor have a son, and would perish at the age of 53. 

 He still remains spiritual, and undergoes a spiritual retreat. The buddhist master there informs him that despite his considerable accomplishments--  he was capable of maintaining concentration for 3 days and 3 nights, without sleeping, he has yet to transcend the ordinary world of yin and yang. This is because he has yet to achieve the capacity of entering the phase of 'no-thought', thereby allowing him to escape the constant fluctuations of yin and yang. His unthinking subjection to these forces  is what allows his fate to be calculated to the minutest detail. 

 The master then proceeds to describe how he could transcend this fate, through a regimen of moral and spiritual cultivation. Of partcoiular note is how the accumulation of good deeds would enable one to improve one's fate-- a theme echoed by similar morality books like the Taishang Ganying Pian. After receiving this valuable teaching, he changes his name from Xuehai to Liao-fan ("transcending the ordinary"). After accomplishing these deeds, his fortune begins to improve. He passed the imperial exam, gave birth to a son (to which the book is written for) and he did not die at the age of 53-- indeed, he states his age is 69 when he wrote the book!

The second  part of the book details how this is to be actualised; in brief, one first must repent one's faults, which requires a sense of shame, a sense of fear [specifically of constant divine retribution], and finally the courage to do. Then there are ways of doing so viz changing behaviour [etc]. Finally the benefits for such moral cultivation are enumerated, as well as the bad consequences of neglecting it.

The third part of the book is the longest. It begins with an assortment of stories of the meritorious consequences for doing good deeds. The first is particularly illustrative. Yang kong was a high official. Yang's grandfather was a boatman who rescued people during a storm. As a result of this merit, a divine being manifested before them, and proceed to direct them to a location to build their ancestral tomb. Yang's family prospered- and indeed, continues to prosper. 

The readers of this text would be immediately aware of the fact that the positioning of a tomb had a direct effect on the fortunes of its descendants. This positioning can be determined directly through actual surveying of the landscape through Fengshui, but that is an incredibly troublesome process. The implied subtext, is that the yang family's prosperity arose from access to such a good grave site, knowledge of which gravesite arose because of the Grandfather's righteousness. As much as the strictures of Yin and Yang existed, and could have effects on people, Moral cultivation allowed one to transcend these strictures, and indeed, reap the best of them. 

This is followed by a long dialog between a group of scholars and master Zhong, on true and false good deeds. The former are acts done for purely altruistic reasons; the latter with some ulterior, self-serving motive. The two forms are easily confused-- hence the continued misfortunes of those who apparently do good, or the fortunes of those who apparently do bad. there are circumstances where acts of goodness may arise from bad motives. An example given is a rich family taking the law into their own hands in a time of famine. Although their motives are selfish (protecting their own property) it deters others from committing further acts of chaos.

 Further sections go into precise detail about the various kinds of good acts.  Liao-fan himself gives a list of ten: as translated by Silent voices, they are 

    1. To support the practice of kindness.
    2. To revere love and respect.
    3. To help others succeed in practicing goodness.
    4. To persuade others to practice kindness.
    5. To help those in desperate need.
    6. To develop public projects for the greater benefit of people.
    7. To practice merits by giving wealth.
    8. To protect and maintain proper teachings.
    9. To respect elders.
    10. To love and cherish all living things. 

Liao-fan provides commentary on all of them.  

The last part of the book details more morality tales, mostly revolving around taking the Imperial Exam. Many modern students may sympathise with these people, and indeed find the examples most lively. 

Western readers, on reading the text may be surprised to see how seamlessly buddhism fits within this framework of divination: Liao-fan meets the original diviner at a buddhist temple, and the man who teaches him how to transcend his destiny is also a buddhist monk. In turn, things that would strike the reader as 'un-buddhist' the I Ching, sending petitions to heaven and writing talismans are mentioned without the least remark or comment. Indeed the recitation of the mantra of Cundi is explicitly stated as part of the spiritual regimen the monk prescribes to Liao-fan to change his fate. 

Again, in the second part of the book, we find Liao-fan freely quoting Confucian philosophers like Mencius with regards to the role of shame, and moral examples. 

However, it must be said that for precisely these reasons, this text has ceased to be a part of ordinary moral education. After all, the motivating factor for the book is divination: acts of good allow one to transcend one's divinatory ordained fate. With the disappearance of divination as a valid way of knowing,-- along with belief the whole ecosystem of spirits, underworld judges, and officers that police the deeds of men, and allow the whole thing to work-- this book doubtless fades in the background. 

Regardless, the impact of the book cannot be understated: I was once in a Singaporean fortune-teller's shop, which constantly played the Cundi mantra in the backgound-- evidently derived from the teaching of this book. Contemporary fortune-tellers occasionally cite it, to show how their clients should treat their predictions, and indeed, alter their own fortunes. 

*** *** *** 

Two translations  in English exist; 

The first is by Zhi hai Huang, http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/liaofan.pdf 

It does not appear to be a translation from the Classical Chinese at all, but rather a transcription form an audiobook retelling of the text into vernacular. This is quite reasonable, as the original is in an exceptionally refined and complex form of classical chinese. Because of this, the translation is in a dialogue format, which is something that is completely absent from the original 

The second translation is by "Silent voices". 

http://www.namoamitabha.net/en/publication/liaofan/liaofan_chinkung.pdf

As far as I can tell, this is the only good English translation extant.It is not a literal translation from the Classical Chinese- modernising terms here and there, putting glosses into the translation itself.   Indeed, in the first section of this text, it suffers from the exact opposite problem as the first translation: It is in the first person throughout, whereas in the original there is reported speech!  

 The PDF that is accessible, though, has a massive amount of commentary. A single paragraph of the original can bear as much as four pages of commentary  so much so that a book that is just under 50 pages in the original chinese  https://books.google.com/books?id=LWFIzIUOki8C&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false is now 300-odd pages long! Mercifully, the provide a bare text of the translation-- but only at the very end of the book! 

Much of this commentary is interpretations and exegesis of the book from a buddhist standpoint-- specifically the Pure land viewpoint.  

In any case I have given the translation -- with the original Chinese text, and some of my own comments here https://edwardwhite123.blogspot.com/2022/03/liao-fans-four-lessons-silent-voices.html 


Liao-fan's four lessons: Silent Voices' translation, with a parallel Chinese text

This translation has been extracted from the translation by Silent Voices. It is the only good English translation that exists, to my knowledge. I have taken it from this PDF http://www.namoamitabha.net/en/publication/liaofan/liaofan_chinkung.pdf. 

The original text is surrounded by rather massive a commentary. It is of the Pure Land buddhist school, and makes frequent references to how the book can be integrated into the Pure land practise.The commentary is extensive indeed. In some cases, one paragraph of the original is followed by four pages of commentary! Mercifully, the authors have provided an uninterrupted commentary of the text-- but only at the very back of the book.

The translation is not always literal, which is understandable, given its purpose. Dates in the Chinese calendar have been turned into the rather vaguer "some years ago" etc. The translators prefer "dollars" or "cents" for the corresponding ancient units. I have re-translated Parts where I have felt the translators have departed greatly from the Chinese.  I have also added some comments etc. where I felt they are necessary. These parts are marked with an "E".

 In this post I have placed Silent Voices' translation next to the Chinese original, which was taken from Wikisource.https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E4%BA%86%E5%87%A1%E5%9B%9B%E8%A8%9  It is hoped that by re-issuing this translation in this form, it may reach a wider audience. May it provide an insight as to Chinese ideas of fate and fortune, as well as a source of moral teachings.

I will set out a preliminary analysis of the text in a future blogpost 


Sunday, 20 March 2022

文昌帝君陰騭文 -- . Wenchang's Treatise on Secret Merit : Three translations

In this post I will post three translations of a fairly well-known chinese morality book, called:

文昌帝君陰騭文
Eichel: Treatise of the Secret Law by the Lord and God of Composition 
Carus/ The Tract of the Quiet Way 
Chung / Lord Superior Wen Chang's Tract On The First Step Towards Non Abidance
E.W. Wenchang's Treatise on Secret Merits 

It is much of the nature of the The Sage Therach Guan's true Scripture to Awaken the world. that I featured earlier in this blog: a revelation from an important God, encouraging people to do good, and abstain from evil.  In this case, the God that delivered this text is Wenchang, the God of literature. The text was fairly popular in the 19thc,  with even illustrated versions existing, and is still occasionally printed today. Three English translations exist, but alas, all three of them are flawed one way or another. For that reason, more than any text, it is necessary to set them side-by-side. 

Friday, 22 October 2021

The High King Guanyin Sutra as an apocryphal sutra: A responsa of Master Jingkong,

In Chinese Buddhism we find a scripture known as the High King Guanyin Sutra 高王觀音經. This sutra has already been featured twice before on this blog: 

first in translation: https://edwardwhite123.blogspot.com/2020/11/high-king-avalokitesvara-sutra.html  

and secondly as to its preface: https://edwardwhite123.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-original-preface-to-high-king.html 

However, it has recently come to my attention that Some Chinese buddhists consider this sutra an Apocryphal sutra 偽經 and hence a suboptimal means of devotion,  In this post I shall translate a responsa given by Master Jingkong as to this sutra, available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNYVi96YA98

 

這位同修問:「《高王觀世音經》,請問是真經或是偽經?」

A Devotee asked: "Is the High King Guanyin Sutra a true or apocryphal sutra?

答:古大德說這個經是後人偽造的,不是佛說的。

Answer: "The Great Virtuous ones of old stated that this scripture [i.e. the High King scripture] is created by later people, and is not spoken by the buddha

"你喜歡念也可以,總而言之,都是勸善,不是教你作惡的。 You can recite it if you please- after all, it encourages people to do good, rather than evil.

假如你真的有智慧,為什麼不去念《普門品》 But if you really have Prajna [Wisdom], why not recite the "Universal Gate chapter?

或者是《楞嚴經》第六卷「觀世音菩薩耳根圓通章」?Or indeed, the sixth chapter of the Surangama Sutra "The Chapter of Guanyin's Ear root completion?"

華嚴經》跟《楞嚴經》觀世音菩薩這兩章經文都有單獨流通,合《法華經‧普門品》,叫「觀音三經」。"These two chapters, from the Flower Ornament Sutra, the Surangama Sutra, along with the Guanyin Chapter of the Lotus sutra, are collectively called the "Three Sutras of Guanyin."

這是真實的,決定不是虛偽的,為什麼不念這個?這是給諸同修自己去選擇。 These are true scriptures, and are not false. Why not recite those? I leave the choice to all those who intend to cultivate [the Buddhist path]"

***

Comments:

When read together with the preface shown above, it is evident why the scripture is considered "false" or 'Apocryphal' as it was not transmitted by the Buddha. As the preface makes plain, this scripture was revealed by a monk who appeared in a dream to someone.

Indeed, Master Jingkong's point actually restores the hierarchy that was inverted in the High King Sutra's preface. Said preface explicitly states that the person to which the sutra was revealed, chanted the Lotus sutra's Guanyin chapter endlessly to no effect.

But, returning to Master Jingkong's speech, he does not state the scripture is harmful: after all, about half the scripture is consisted of nothing but the names of buddhas and Buddhisatvas. Indeed, the comments left beneath the youtube videos suggest that the sutra is still effective- eg reporting cures of cancer after reciting the sutra ten thousand times

Another commentator added that reciting this scripture allowed them to have a dream-vision of their mother

More broadly, one wonders if this rejection of the sutra yet another example of the protestantisation of buddhism- emphasis more securely canonical works, rather than extra-canonical literature like this. In any case, I recently heard form a Singaporean acquaintance, when he tried to ask Internal Printers-- a Singaporean company that exclusively prints Buddhist scriptures-- if they could print this scripture, they refused to do so, saying "it is not a buddhist scripture".

In any case, it is interesting to note that this scripture has also found its way into the Taisho Tripitaka-- albeit under volume 85,the volume of (amongst other things) "Doubtful sutras")

http://tripitaka.cbeta.org/T85n2898_001



Thursday, 30 September 2021

Questions and Answers with Confucius 孔子問答

 In this post, I will post a bilingual edition of a curious Chinese text about Confucius. Entitled 孔子問答, - Questions and Answers with Confucius, also called 小兒論- Discussions with a child -- it shows how Confucius is is first matched, then flummoxed by a  boy called Xiang Tuo.項橐 It is reprinted yearly in Chinese almanacs.

His story was mentioned as early as in the Stratagems of the Warring states, https://jenniferdodgson.wixsite.com/warringstates/qinwang2 , but the actual interactions, we are told, was lost. The text translated here is probably an apocryphal text that fitted into this story. Xiang Tuo also has a baidu article (In Chinese  https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%A1%B9%E6%A9%90/3121539 )


One of the segments of the Stratagems In which Xiang Tuo (or, as he is called, Xiang Gao) is mentioned


Only one translation has been made of this text, which is found in Martin Palmer et, al's T'ung Shu (Vinpress, 1990),. However, this translation is also flawed-- and indeed, leaves out an entire segment of the text. The author thus reproduces Palmer's translation here, correcting it as necessary, and supplying the missing parts. 


.  

.  
These images are the text as shown in the 廣經堂 Guang jing Tang Almanac for 2020. The actual text translated is in the bottom half of the page. The top half of every page except the first is occupied with a list of Confucius' disciples, and has nothing to do with the bottom "Q&A with Confucius" text, except, perhaps, in theme,